Utløpt
Kunngjøring av konkurranse
Tilbudsfrist 4. juli 2025 kl. 12:00
Fristen har passert
Beskrivelse
Oppdraget gjelder kjøp av vektertjenester til Hamar tinghus og består primært av tre hovedaktiviteter: 1) Sikkerhetstjenester på dagtid, 2) Kveldsinspeksjon og 3) Alarmutrykning. For mer informasjon om oppdraget, se bilag 1 - Oppdragsgivers kravspesifikasjon.
Krav og betingelser
Strukturerte felter fra konkurransegrunnlaget (eForms-XML).
Kvalifikasjonskrav
Oppfyller du kravene? 0 av 24 huket av – du oppfyller alle registrerte kvalifikasjonskrav 👍
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable?
Has the economic operator, to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the field of environmental law?
Has the economic operator, to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the field of labour law?
Has the economic operator, to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the field of social law?
Has the economic operator entered into agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition?
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein commited significant breaches of his professonial integrety, within the meaning of Regulations Regarding Public Procurement FOR -2016- 08 12 -974 § 24- 2 (3) i?
Can the economic operator confirm that:
a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,
b) It has withheld such information,
c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, and
d) It has undertaken to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?
Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in the procurement procedure?
Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the procurement procedure?
Has the economic operator experienced that a prior public contract, a prior contract with a contracting entity or a prior concession contract was terminated early, or that damages or other comparable sanctions were imposed in connection with that prior contract?
Do the purely national grounds of exclusion, which are specified in the relevant notice or in the procurement documents, apply?
Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?
Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?
Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended?
Is the economic operator bankrupt?
Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors?
Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding- up?
Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the court?
Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from a similar procedure under national laws and regulations?
Selvvurdering – huk av det bedriften din oppfyller. Lagres kun i din nettleser.
Få full anbudsanalyse (PDF)
4-siders rapport med kjøperens historikk, sannsynlige konkurrenter, pris-benchmark og risiko-signaler.
199 kr per anbud. Pro-abonnenter får 10/mnd inkludert.
Geografi
Innlandet
Stedet er hentet direkte fra kunngjøringen og kan være oppdragsgivers
administrative region, ikke nødvendigvis der ytelsen faktisk leveres.
Om denne anskaffelsen
Denne kunngjøringen ble publisert på Doffin 2. juni 2025 av Domstoladministrasjonen. Estimert verdi er 3 000 000 kr, eks. mva.
Tilbydere bør lese hele konkurransegrunnlaget nøye og merke seg kvalifikasjonskrav, tildelingskriterier og frister. Spørsmål til konkurransen rettes til oppdragsgiver.
Andre anbud fra Domstoladministrasjonen
Lignende anbud
5 500 000 kr
01.10.2026
9 dager igjen
7 000 000 kr
02.10.2026
8 dager igjen
150 000 000 kr
15.10.2026
13 dager igjen
09.10.2026
16 dager igjen
510 000 000 kr
26.08.2024
1525 dager igjen
30 000 000 kr
22.10.2026
26 dager igjen
Flere anbud i samme bransje